What's new
By:
Filters
Roleplay UK

Join the UK's biggest roleplay community on FiveM and experience endless new roleplay opportunities!

Will this run ArmA 3?

Thank you everyone for sharing their ideas. I will have another look through the thread and make a final choice on the PC that I would like to build.

 
Portuguese007 said:
Man but he doesnt need a I7, he will be better served with a i3 then that amd, you dont need to be like that.
Click to expand...
Trolling4.png


 
lionel said:
Trolling4.png
Click to expand...
I love people like you, how about you google a litle? A i3 from older generation like 3220 at 3,3ghz will have avrg same frames as a amd fx-6350 at 4,9ghz(or even the fx8xxx that it isnt even a real octacore, a shity quadcore). He can get a  i3-6100 that comes at 3,7ghz(and far better IPC then the old 3220) that is gonna be far superior than the amds in arma3, less consume and he can even overclock them with the right tools. Plz come more with the stupid gifs, now you gonna say that amd engine uses all cores? 

And yes forget the fanboys, i am a amd graphic card happy user but in cpus they are crap, the vishera amds in terms of IPC are similar then the old phenoms(first were even worst) and when i changed from the phenom x4 965 @ 4,0ghz to my i5 2500k 4,0ghz i got double frames in some games that are heavy core, arma2 was from day to night and arma3 is the same but ok, go amd because to the ignorant people the more cores and velocity is better.

EDIT: Something like @LCN Harry because amd got horrible IPC and false cores, the IPC of amds are trash near intel and arma3 uses a shit old engine that cant even use 2 engines decently. I realy wish amd had better cpus because intel in the last 5years done what they pleased and didnt even bodered improving their cpus a lot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fqd4zN8.jpg


FYI Bing is much better than google

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Portuguese007 said:
I love people like you, how about you google a litle? A i3 from older generation like 3220 at 3,3ghz will have avrg same frames as a amd fx-6350 at 4,9ghz(or even the fx8xxx that it isnt even a real octacore, a shity quadcore). He can get a  i3-6100 that comes at 3,7ghz(and far better IPC then the old 3220) that is gonna be far superior than the amds in arma3, less consume and he can even overclock them with the right tools. Plz come more with the stupid gifs, now you gonna say that amd engine uses all cores? 

And yes forget the fanboys, i am a amd graphic card happy user but in cpus they are crap, the vishera amds in terms of IPC are similar then the old phenoms(first were even worst) and when i changed from the phenom x4 965 @ 4,0ghz to my i5 2500k 4,0ghz i got double frames in some games that are heavy core, arma2 was from day to night and arma3 is the same but ok, go amd because to the ignorant people the more cores and velocity is better.

EDIT: Something like @LCN Harry because amd got horrible IPC and false cores, the IPC of amds are trash near intel and arma3 uses a shit old engine that cant even use 2 engines decently. I realy wish amd had better cpus because intel in the last 5years done what they pleased and didnt even bodered improving their cpus a lot.
Click to expand...
I gave up a long time ago trying to reason with these people, they just ignore facts.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top