You've lost me here. I was banned for G2.1 and was questioned about using any game modifications. I explained I didn't use any and went above and beyond to prove I was innocent which resulted in the staff team unbanning me. I don't know why I was flagged but from what I have been able to find out it was a claim based on one clip that was "suspect", whatever that means. If someone was falsely banned the ban in question is never held against them so why is it now being held against me. I also feel like there must be confusion because I was never involved in a ticket regarding the G2.1 ban, only the current one I am appealing now.
Think we both have different definitions to what the message said however you indeed was told that you would be kept a close eye on moving forward and that you wanted to "shall we just go shoot up feds", As Charles mentioned doesn't seem like high quality roleplay as a whole.
My own actions? My first ban was a false one, anyone can see that by reading the replies to the original appeal. I was banned on a false assumption. My second ban - this one - was a result of me picking someone up that I could see in the doorway. Every single claim made by myself and others on my side have seemingly been dismissed and every claim to the contrary has been believed as gospel.
Again as mentioned if you can find me where we have told you it was false then that's fine, However in the meantime read over the response in your last appeal for the prior ban you received.
We asked for video evidence in this report however there we're claims that it was corrupted "Yet that was a lie", However not from you directly however if you have video from this then please post it here or send it to myself on discord, I'll take a look and we will go from there as we have video on the report so we can go off what we do see there as a third party. I'm not interested in other peoples claim on your appeal in all honesty as this is for you and only you to justify your own actions, Not theirs.
If others have been banned then they will have their own appeals if they are on permanent for example to put their case forward however we are going off the videos provided and things mentioned in the report, So I'd say it's a bit of a stretch to say "You don't believe my words only theirs" when it's a video so again if you wish to provide video of this that lead to the ban I'm open to watch and go from there.
I'm glad you brought up the kicks because it brings up an important point. If the staff member that issued the warning on November 11th saw that I had some previous kicks then why didn't that individual push for a ban? Why did they not push for a ban for any of these offences, why only kicks? Could it possibly be because they saw merit in my role play efforts at the time? It seems to me that if I was spiraling down a path of negative behaviour they would look to rectify and correct it sooner?
I cannot speak for the member or members of staff who pushed the kicks however one could say yes you we're given a lot of opportunities to act more accordingly over spending however long here. Could that have something to do with how you roleplayed in the past? Sure it could. Could it also be we believed you would learn from a kick over a ban? Indeed it could, However by the "Spiralling" means you are picking up more and more punishments from kicks/warnings and finally bans, More so in the last 12 months.
Now was this after your time with Triads? Yes it was, So begs to question why you are now picking up kicks/warnings ect ? What's changed? What's caused this type of behaviour as like you mentioned your last punishment (Outside of 2023) was back in 2021 so this does have me questioning why, Please help me understand this.
I didn't record because why would I? I clip 10 min intervals and nothing worthwhile happened so I didn't clip. IF I was asked to clip then I would have but the other party never asked to liaise or gave any warning. They hid their negative feelings and brought it up later after our ability to clip had passed. That is not acting in good faith at all and I don't know why this piece of context is being ignored as like you say yourself, context is everything. Do you record every single one of your interactions? I don't know many that do.
So where is the clip someone involved has? Since a screenshot of this "Corrupted video" was posted on the report that lead to your ban. Did you read the report? Because it was mentioned that they wanted to talk after words however that's what a report is for, Time to speak to other people. The report was made by the other party and that's their choice to make, Same as every other player on the server.
Just because a report is made has nothing to do with "Good faith" since we have video showing what happened from one side and nothing willing to be shown from the other. As to do I record every single interaction? Yes, I record my whole time on the server whilst not many do indeed there is people who do.
I have absolutely no problem with giving other avenues of role play a shot. I am against this decision because you are cutting me off from the friend group I have interacted with for well over a year. I will not be able to be with them on the server, or engage with them. It cuts especially deep when I feel like I haven't done anything worthy of this extreme treatment. It is not just about the videos, although it is a big aspect of it, I have other plans I wish to achieve on that character and to clarify, they are not gun play focused.
That's good to hear, However the decision behind you not playing on Kane will not change. As mentioned for the past 12 months you've received multiple kicks and leading to you ending up here so maybe it is time for a change in a different direction. Change things up and back to how you we're in 2021/2022.
Indeed you will not be side by side with your friends on Kane, However down the line should a character meet people (organically) then of course you can build a friendship up and see where the roleplay goes, Nothing against that at all.
You say it's not all gun focused yet as Charles mentioned and I'll quote here "Secondly, in a recent medal video you are heard saying "shall we just go shoot up feds" that does not scream high quality RP to me." leads me to believe different. Not saying you are only here for gun play however doesn't help when you are now saying different huh?
I'll try and explain it a bit better with more reason. I had plans to make a police character again and was very close to pulling the trigger and doing it. However, now that there's a possibility of me being forced into doing it, I have lost all interest. A good example is when leads of gangs or faction leads feel obligated to log on or when they feel they have to do something they lose motivation to play. It's similar to that. By forcing me to do something, all it's doing is making it a box ticking exercise and takes all the passion for role play out of it. Does that make sense?
I can understand where you are coming from however as mentioned above the last 12 months the punishments have been getting more and more. Now not saying that it's true or false that you "We're going to make a police character" for example now you don't, That is your choice however the decision made above is one that will be in place, If you don't wish to agree to them terms that is your call overall however I do hope you understand that it won't change.
I'll give a few examples to hopefully make you understand why I feel it's unfair:
In all honesty, Other peoples appeals hold no weight for your appeal as all bans are different in their own way so I will not be going into them nor explaining why they we're delt with the way they we're. However the one theme you point out is cooldowns, This isn't something we have done with you and allowed you to appeal right away.
If you wish for me to deny your appeal with a cooldown to make it feel fair then please let me know.
Like I've said before, I want to work with you. Read each of my points and talk about it, @Danoo said earlier in the appeal that staff are not AI, therefore some of my points must make sense. I am not asking for a complete absolution of all consequences but I think the terms could be adjusted to reflect what is fair, without effecting my future role play and possible avenues of role play in legal factions.
Indeed we are not AI, Hence why I didn't respond yesterday after work as I knew I had bit to read and wanted to address ect, However again it's your own actions that have lead you here and to the decision we have made.