You've not really
angered me, and of course I agree that you have every right to an opinion.
However, an opinion based on
nothing but hearsay is
always going to be very likely derided and pulled apart in seconds, whereas a
considered opinion, based upon solid facts, first-hand-gathered evidence, conclusions derived from exploration, exposure and some actual, genuine detective-work, will always count for a hell of a lot more.
I think you'd probably agree that your opinion of the new housing system was more of the second and less of the first, no? You pretty much said so yourself...
We're not hating on
you, btw, just your actions in this single instance. If you'd spent a few days going balls-deep on the housing system, of course your opinion would count a hell of a lot more, and we wouldn't be having quite the same tone to the conversation, most likely.
My worry is that
unfounded (or at least 'poorly-researched') negativity about 'a thing' tends to spread like wildfire - and before you know it, we have a hundred other Toms, none of whom have actually
played the update, all complaining that it's shit. That would concern me greatly. It can sometimes be very difficult then to convince
other players to check out 'the thing' and spend time understanding it.
Similarly, it can be very hard sometimes to convince a developer who has worked really hard on something, that he
is being taken seriously and not just having his ideas tossed aside by people who can't even be bothered to look at them closely and form sound opinions on them. Given the amount of time that was spent on this by the devs, it can be a mighty big pisser if 'shoutdowns' happen without at least a similar amount of time being spent on
forming those opinions. I'm sure you can see that, given what you've said - and your apology is noted, thanks.