Dante
Well-known member
There is a saying in my country that says : ''if the cap fits you, wear it !''How very nice of you to say something like that Phantom! Does this assumption include yourself? :^)
There is a saying in my country that says : ''if the cap fits you, wear it !''How very nice of you to say something like that Phantom! Does this assumption include yourself? :^)
Make sure that it's a high quality cap then because you will be wearing it for a while! :^)There is a saying in my country that says : ''if the cap fits you, wear it !''
If you say so, and btw I just made a comment, you don't have to get offended <3Make sure that it's a high quality cap then because you will be wearing it for a while! :^)
It's clear the fact is you've fucked up, big time. You chose an incredibly bad position to hold an "auction" and you managed the hostage horribly. Then you allow us to take aim at every hostile? You can guess what is going to happen.My summary is it was going well we got the the island and got killed
#1 coms weren't the best with our negotiator.
#2 if I would have killed god it would have been rdm beciase he was on a different island to me but when god kills me it's not beciase we had a hostage
#3 we were trying to rp a auction for someone getting shot in the middle of it is bad or as you knew it was a auction
#4 it was clear the our negotiator was gong to be armed with the texts
#5 you said you were going to pay 500k now you have said you would not now you have and at every money drop if always ends up in a gunfight so why would we trust you it would be nicer rp if police attended unarmed to bid for there cop
you said you would pay at the time but like I said in my other post we decided to do a auction for rp....also me and my partner were killed the other 2 peole on the island were Mitch and PC Mitch was under a different name but is is not meta gaming if there are 3 armed guys why would you shoot 2 of them on a hunch and leave the 3rdYour negotiator would NOT go lower than 490k
i chose a position I felt was good beciase I expected rp not just kosIt's clear the fact is you've fucked up, big time. You chose an incredibly bad position to hold an "auction" and you managed the hostage horribly. Then you allow us to take aim at every hostile? You can guess what is going to happen.All the hostage takers died, the hostage was saved, victory.
Oh I see, you mean you want money, instead of dying?i chose a position I felt was good beciase I expected rp not just kos
imwouldnt care if he sold for 20p I kidnaped him for some rp and I didn't get thatOh I see, you mean you want money, instead of dying?
What kind of RP were you expecting from us?imwouldnt care if he sold for 20p I kidnaped him for some rp and I didn't get that
Had it not been for the other guy surrendering he would be dead.But my other point still stands how would the shooter know who to shoot out of 3 armed guys 1 unarmed...there are many possibilities of whom could he been who
one where you came to the island and did the auction...or rp me put of selling him something other that getting kos....also irl if you were ntp Shure who the hostage taker was you would not by change kill 2 of the guys.And you did not give me or my fried a change to put or hand upWhat kind of RP were you expecting from us?Had it not been for the other guy surrendering he would be dead.
Didn't understand too much of that, however if you wanted us to give you a chance after you've taken hostage a police officer, you're joking.one where you came to the island and did the auction...or rp me put of selling him something other that getting kos....also irl if you were ntp Shure who the hostage taker was you would not by change kill 2 of the guys.
And you did not give me or my fried a change to put or hand up
my point is...you had a sniper there were 4 guys there we endless possibilities of who the hostage takers were but you "by change" shot the right 2 somthing irl the police would not do. You then let the 3rd man surrender. It's what I would call meta gaming you knew all the names of the people on the island dispute not been told the as we used code names and took the pC radio. After you killed us you let the man surrender and let the other guy go. What if I had given the gun to the hostage and stood with my hands up....what if the 3rd man was the hostage taker many many possibilitiesDI Bob said:Didn't understand too much of that, however if you wanted us to give you a chance after you've taken hostage a police officer, you're joking.
my point is...you had a sniper there were 4 guys there we endless possibilities of who the hostage takers were but you "by change" shot the right 2 somthing irl the police would not do. You then let the 3rd man surrender. It's what I would call meta gaming you knew all the names of the people on the island dispute not been told the as we used code names and took the pC radio. After you killed us you let the man surrender and let the other guy go. What if I had given the gun to the hostage and stood with my hands up....what if the 3rd man was the hostage taker many many possibilities
And of in real life a police is taken by a rebel (in a high gang position) they talk face to face they don't kill him.
Incorrect, we had more than one sniper, also if a video is posted from the police point of view it will show the radio at that time where we assumed he was a hostage taker. No metagaming was done and it is a silly accusation to make. Also if you had given the gun to the hostage, credit to you, that hostage would be dead.Way it looks to me..you killed me and Connell from our name tags let Mitch surrender as you knew he was not the hostage taker and just let the PC run around. All from name tags as you had no idea our names and of you just guessed that even worse rp as irl police would not do that
i for some reason doubt that..there was not evidence strong enough to determine me or Connell were the hostage takers if real poloce took a shot to kill a man on instinct he would loose his job it was bad or or mete gaming .Incorrect, we had more than one sniper, also if a video is posted from the police point of view it will show the radio at that time where we assumed he was a hostage taker. No metagaming was done and it is a silly accusation to make. Also if you had given the gun to the hostage, credit to you, that hostage would be dead.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.