Sirdaanslot
Well-known member
- Location
- Netherlands
Agreed massive bs. If the guy who is playing rebel is playing it so good that you have to resort to ooc info then i would rather have in the faction then kicked out
Roleplay UK
Join the UK's biggest roleplay community on FiveM and experience endless new roleplay opportunities!
Rules Feedback
- Thread starter Wilco
- Start date
- Location
- TBJs basement
"This list goes on but includes anything that is considered illegal on the RPUK server. If you breach this rule you will be removed from the police Service and blacklisted with a board decision as to whether you can rejoin depending on the severity of the crimes which you commit.*
*You can be caught out of roleplay for breaking this rule."
This is from the police Rules and guidelines
*You can be caught out of roleplay for breaking this rule."
This is from the police Rules and guidelines
YoCo
Master Criminal
- Location
- London
- Location
- TBJs basement
YoCo
Master Criminal
- Location
- London
Well server rules supersede police/Poseidon rules, and metagame is metagame.
I think if evidence is presented of someone potentially playing rebel for example, the faction leaders should have a duty to investigate within RP. If people are playing rebel it wouldn’t be that hard to capture them and find out with a bit of planning.
IMO, I think the faction leaders just take the lazy route by using battlemetrics.
the server constantly says RP Everything. Not RP everything unless it makes it easier for you.
I think if evidence is presented of someone potentially playing rebel for example, the faction leaders should have a duty to investigate within RP. If people are playing rebel it wouldn’t be that hard to capture them and find out with a bit of planning.
IMO, I think the faction leaders just take the lazy route by using battlemetrics.
the server constantly says RP Everything. Not RP everything unless it makes it easier for you.
Last edited by a moderator:
Simon Ross
Šîmøñ Rø$š
- Location
- --
I had this conversation with someone around 10 months ago and the conclusion was ranks are OOC, so it isn’t meta game, however it cannot be found using staff tools (I believe)
Simon Ross
Šîmøñ Rø$š
- Location
- --
YoCo
Master Criminal
- Location
- London
How are interviews out of character, you’re being asked about police laws. You’re applying for that role in character?
you think when I applied for the police I’m out of character while in my interview reciting the Miranda rights?
@Simon Ross out of game doesn’t equal out of character
you think when I applied for the police I’m out of character while in my interview reciting the Miranda rights?
@Simon Ross out of game doesn’t equal out of character 
Stavik
Do not go gentle into that good night
Management
Staff Team
Legendary Donator
Los Santos Police Command
Gruppe 6
Los Santos Rangers
- Location
- Norway
Staff viewed compromise, would it not be better to only do this in BZ aka Police stations? (dev fix) instead of
removing the functions cause there are people in the APS that does not have the DLC(s).
We have approached the ArmA 3 Devs.
Will be looked into^ Thanks Samat!
If you can prove a rule is broken and provide us the evidence of this we can deal with this appropriately.
Maxim
Most Controversial Member of RPUK
- Location
- Leicestershire
Stavik, regarding the metagaming comment about factions, could we get a definitive answer about that? Some people think faction command can't remove people unless caught in RP but this is clearly not the case due to certain situations recently where people have been removed due to Faction command checking battlemetrics for example. Is this a rulebreak since the factions are technically within roleplay? And if it isn't, to what extent can faction command use out of game information?
- Location
- B-74
Im just looking for some clarafucation regarding
(G2.5) Compliance - If someone complies with your demands you may not kill them, unless they were involved in an illegal transaction. (Sale of drugs/weapons/dirty cash)
By the implication of MAY does this mean that you can still kill someone even if they are complying with your requests
but I presume from the way the initial part of this rule is layed out it would make more of an implication that it's leaning towards the side of you can not kill someone if they are complying with your requests/demands
again just looking for some clarification regarding the wording of this rule.
(G2.5) Compliance - If someone complies with your demands you may not kill them, unless they were involved in an illegal transaction. (Sale of drugs/weapons/dirty cash)
By the implication of MAY does this mean that you can still kill someone even if they are complying with your requests
but I presume from the way the initial part of this rule is layed out it would make more of an implication that it's leaning towards the side of you can not kill someone if they are complying with your requests/demands
again just looking for some clarification regarding the wording of this rule.
- Location
- Kavala
(7.1.7) Warning shots must be issued with 3 tracer rounds past the front and rear of the aircraft. Enough time should be given to comply before taking action.
This rule details the correct way of issuing warning shots to an aircraft, by issuing 3 tracer rounds front and back, and to my understanding would other ways be considered incorrect.
It has come to my attention that people are using 100 round 'reload tracer' magazines which fires a tracer round every third shot (even .50 cal Off-roads have been used for this purpose).
My own understanding of this rule would imply that if someone attempts to tracer an aircraft with a 100rnd 'reload tracer' magazine, every non-tracer round would be considered RDM as the person shooting is firing upon someone without engaging in any form of RP.
If this is the case, could it be clarified by stating that the warning shots must only be tracer rounds, otherwise considered as RDM
To:
(7.1.7) Warning shots must be issued with 3 tracer rounds past the front and rear of the aircraft. Enough time should be given to comply before taking action. Firing anything other than tracer rounds towards the aircraft is considered RDM.
This rule details the correct way of issuing warning shots to an aircraft, by issuing 3 tracer rounds front and back, and to my understanding would other ways be considered incorrect.
It has come to my attention that people are using 100 round 'reload tracer' magazines which fires a tracer round every third shot (even .50 cal Off-roads have been used for this purpose).
My own understanding of this rule would imply that if someone attempts to tracer an aircraft with a 100rnd 'reload tracer' magazine, every non-tracer round would be considered RDM as the person shooting is firing upon someone without engaging in any form of RP.
If this is the case, could it be clarified by stating that the warning shots must only be tracer rounds, otherwise considered as RDM
To:
(7.1.7) Warning shots must be issued with 3 tracer rounds past the front and rear of the aircraft. Enough time should be given to comply before taking action. Firing anything other than tracer rounds towards the aircraft is considered RDM.
Last edited by a moderator:
MacDonald
Well-known member
- Location
- Glasgow Scotland
wonder who did that...
How is it RDM if no shots are hitting the vehicle or the occupant.
TBH tracers or not if its obvious that someone has shot infront and behind your heli, its common sense for them to shoot you down anyway and if you complain after sitting around thinking "they didnt give me TRACERS" its just ruleplaying.
- Location
- Kavala
(2.2) Random Deathmatch (also known as RDM) - Shooting at someone without engaging in any form of quality role play is considered RDM.
YoCo
Master Criminal
- Location
- London
You’re not shooting AT them, you’re shooting in front and behind.
I think the rule is fine as it is, it’s ruleplaying to say otherwise. If somebody shoots 9 bullets of 100 round mags at the front and back of your heli. You’ll have had your 3 tracers. It’s pretty obvious of their intentions.
Last edited by a moderator:
Stavik
Do not go gentle into that good night
Management
Staff Team
Legendary Donator
Los Santos Police Command
Gruppe 6
Los Santos Rangers
- Location
- Norway
You dont't kill them.
After a discussion in the rulesmeeting the rule is fine. It's up to the party issuing the warning shots to make sure that it's been done properly.
- Location
- United Kingdom
Current NLR Rules
[SIZE=medium](5.4) When you are revived/downed:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]You may not actively enter or continue any combat situation for the next 5 minutes.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Your character retains all knowledge of the time before they are downed.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]While you are downed you may not divulge tactical information to anyone. The exception to this is information spoken in direct chat in game. Please be mindful that you are heavily injured and should act accordingly.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This does not apply if your character has been the victim of a clearcut case of RDM/VDM.[/SIZE]
Focusing on the last part "This does not apply if your character has been the victim of a clearcut case of RDM/VDM." Seems to be saying that if you were downed and revived that you can get involved in a situation if you are being RDM'd or VDM'd and you are able to divulge tactical information in Team Speak when downed if you were VDM'd or RDM'd. Was this intended?
[SIZE=medium](5.4) When you are revived/downed:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]You may not actively enter or continue any combat situation for the next 5 minutes.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Your character retains all knowledge of the time before they are downed.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]While you are downed you may not divulge tactical information to anyone. The exception to this is information spoken in direct chat in game. Please be mindful that you are heavily injured and should act accordingly.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This does not apply if your character has been the victim of a clearcut case of RDM/VDM.[/SIZE]
Focusing on the last part "This does not apply if your character has been the victim of a clearcut case of RDM/VDM." Seems to be saying that if you were downed and revived that you can get involved in a situation if you are being RDM'd or VDM'd and you are able to divulge tactical information in Team Speak when downed if you were VDM'd or RDM'd. Was this intended?
Last edited by a moderator:
Well it makes sense that you should be able to inform others that you have been RDMd/VDMd and you need saving. Also it helps locate the culprit to prevent further damage and rule breaks.