Mack Daniels
Banned
- Location
- Tequila-la
Hello @OneShot, hope all is well. Let me go into this...
We had been looking for a police officer for a fairly lengthy amount of time and had previously came across multiple firearms officers, and to say the least we didn't fancy a full scaled gunfight over a failed hostage taking - so we decided to strip him of his items instead. In hindsight, this could've developed into much better roleplay for all parties involved but we worked with what we could at the time of the situation.
However, I do see where you're coming from and agree that there could've been more time given for him to comply with the commands.
Finally I would like to add, as Bowen stated in this report, if we would have proceeded to follow the police constable back to MRPS this would be seen as NVL as we are to roleplay that the station is fully manned at all times which is not something we would be able to handle. Please see Bowen's final reply below -
Yes, he pressed it less than a second after I shot. He started to speed up as I pointed my gun at him, showing no intention to stop the vehicle. If I shot at his character and downed him as a result of him failing to listen to my instruction, I would fully agree that it is RDM due to the little amount of time he had. However, that's not the case; I shot his tires out as a warning and as an attempt to stop his vehicle from going anywhere closer to MRPS.Also when he pressed his panic this was after you shot....
We had been looking for a police officer for a fairly lengthy amount of time and had previously came across multiple firearms officers, and to say the least we didn't fancy a full scaled gunfight over a failed hostage taking - so we decided to strip him of his items instead. In hindsight, this could've developed into much better roleplay for all parties involved but we worked with what we could at the time of the situation.
You're correct, however roleplay had already been started from our end, and the rule reads how it is for when police create a traffic stop on you as the criminal - please correct me if I'm wrong. Furthermore, I would like to add that the police lights being switched on wasn't the focal point as to why I decided to begin taking his tires, it was that amongst other factors which came into play, including the increase in speed, the direction he was going in (towards MRPS) and how he pressed his panic button, alerting other constables of the dire trouble he was in.and when he activated his police lights this doesn't mean RP has initiated as the rule states below
The demands were extremely hard to fully give due to the car moving at high speeds which only increased when the tire was taken. The tire was initially taken to show that these threats are something to be listened to, a gun to the head is no joke and we aren't afraid to use force. The car continued to speed up and drive off to which more tires were taken as we didn't want to kill the police officer but show that his life is in danger and our demands are serious.Do you think this is enough time for him to comply with your demands?
However, I do see where you're coming from and agree that there could've been more time given for him to comply with the commands.
As mentioned above, we were searching for our target and saw multiple firearms cars and we really didn't want to engage in a gun fight with police. Time was running extremely short in this situation, we had shot the tires and he had also communicated that through his radio which we heard at the very end and he also panicked multiple times. The priority in character was to disarm him and then move him but the intensity of the situation had got into our heads and we wanted to leave without police attention.Why didn't you be more creative so you can have that opportunity of providing that RP?
Finally I would like to add, as Bowen stated in this report, if we would have proceeded to follow the police constable back to MRPS this would be seen as NVL as we are to roleplay that the station is fully manned at all times which is not something we would be able to handle. Please see Bowen's final reply below -