Everyone is saying that I got banned 3 times or something like that... And therefore are voting no, I don't know where they got the 2nd and the 3rd ban from, but it was definitely not me.He was only banned once guys...
He was only banned once guys...
Edit: Only banned once and made an appeal that I can still see. There may be a hidden/removed one.He was only banned once guys...
He was banned for being abusive over side chat, and then was banned from the forums because of advertising; also for being a troll on the forums.Edit: Only banned once and made an appeal thqt I can still see. There may be a hidden/removed one.
Its still the same ban in my opinion as the unban request was opened after the incident. The ban button intake only dropped once. But each to their own. I have voted with my opinion and thid looks pretty obvious what the result is anyways.He was banned for being abusive over side chat, and then was banned from the forums because of advertising; also for being a troll on the forums.
There are some players that weren't here whenever I was banned, and they think that this was my 3rd/4th ban based in what some of the members are saying. And therefore are voting no.Its still the same ban in my opinion as the ubnab request was opened after the incident. The ban button intake only dropped once. But each to their own. I have voted with my opinion and thid looks pretty obvious what the result is anyways.
And there are also players who weren't here when you were banned who are voting yes based on what member's are saying. Would you like all members that joined after your ban, have their votes to be abstained from the poll, in terms of Yes & No?There are some players that weren't here whenever I was banned, and they think that this was my 3rd/4th ban based in what some of the members are saying. And therefore are voting no.
To be fair, yep. However lets wait on Wilco...And there are also players who weren't here when you were banned who are voting yes based on what member's are saying. Would you like all members that joined after your ban's votes to be abstained from the poll, in terms of Yes & No?
Amen to that.Concidering the amount of unbacked up information in this thread, I am shocked how a uninformed person can select either yes or no. This vote will roll to 1AM then I will proceed to lock the vote. Please get your last minute votes in.
thisI dont give 2 shits if people "have changed" the rule states that you have 1 appeal with he had and was turned down. This should not even be a option , or our rules are literally liquefied and can "be changed" for the special few if this [SIZE=18.1818180084229px]continues[/SIZE] to be a option . If every one who got banned said they have changed then i would be keen deep in polls by now. A rule is a rule for no matter who. Its [SIZE=18.1818180084229px]also[/SIZE] clear if he comes back most of the [SIZE=18.1818180084229px]community[/SIZE] will be [SIZE=18.1818180084229px]ageist[/SIZE] it, so as soon as he does come back you have 67% [SIZE=18.1818180084229px]displeasure[/SIZE] of the bat.
There is people in the server that got more than 2 chances, not mentioning any single names. After their second ban they came back and got their third chance. This would be my second chance. But people are counting this as the 5th.Carcas in particular should get a poll like this since he got banned for wayy less then dante or w/e and all the others should all have a poll like this if he passes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.