- Location
- A cellar with Mocktage content
Now before I begin with this question, I'd like to state that I don't think there is anything wrong with Admins being in rebel gangs. If you are an admin and you don't particularly fancy a life in the whitelisted factions, then I think it's perfectly acceptable to be a rebel. But where I begin to lose understanding is what happens when a rebel group (that has an admin as a member) is involved in a potential rule break in which they are in the wrong. Does biasty become an issue? Let's say you have a high level staff member who is involved in a gang that frequently breaks rules. Being a member, he may want to stick up for his gang mates, so may make excuses as to why they did what they did. Basically my question is: How is biasty avoided when high ranking staff members are involved? Do multiple admins analyse the evidence? Or is it left to the one admin who may wave the rules for his gang mates?