Dagre
Well-known member
- Location
- South of England
As we all know, we are surrounded by a wealth of hidden rules that come under common sense, or written in the depths of the forums. However, you'll always have one of these pulled out of the bag when you query someones actions. I'd like to get clarification on one. Active gunfights.
Example 1) You are minding your own business, you see a gun. You pick it up, and a rebel/police officer shoots you with no initiation. Is that RDM?
Example 1.5) The same thing, but it's not a gun. It's money, or it's a valuable item, or an unlocked vehicle.
Example 2) You and a few other people are together going about your business. When one who is isolated from the group, starts to be initiated on. He is told to put his hands up, yet refuses, pulls a weapon and shoots dead his attacker. Because you are with that man, do the attackers friends have the right to shoot you as well if you pose no threat? Example 2.5) The same scenario, except you have guns. You know your friend was killed, can the attackers engage on you on the assumption you are with him? Or do they have to further re-engage.
Example 3) You are driving towards the drug dealer, you stop. For no reason other than to sell, and you have a weapon on your back/in your hands. And you are killed, because it turns out that the police are engaging rebels, or rebels are engaging rebels and they see you as a threat in an 'active gunfight' which you had absolutely no idea was going on. Can they do that?
Example 3.5) You hear the gunfire very clearly, so you know there is a gunfight. You get out with your weapon, do they have the right to shoot you still?
Hopefully some of these being answered, will clear things up for me, and others on this community. Since the term active gunfight is thrown around as a police rule, and also a rebel assumption.
Thanks!
Example 1) You are minding your own business, you see a gun. You pick it up, and a rebel/police officer shoots you with no initiation. Is that RDM?
Example 1.5) The same thing, but it's not a gun. It's money, or it's a valuable item, or an unlocked vehicle.
Example 2) You and a few other people are together going about your business. When one who is isolated from the group, starts to be initiated on. He is told to put his hands up, yet refuses, pulls a weapon and shoots dead his attacker. Because you are with that man, do the attackers friends have the right to shoot you as well if you pose no threat? Example 2.5) The same scenario, except you have guns. You know your friend was killed, can the attackers engage on you on the assumption you are with him? Or do they have to further re-engage.
Example 3) You are driving towards the drug dealer, you stop. For no reason other than to sell, and you have a weapon on your back/in your hands. And you are killed, because it turns out that the police are engaging rebels, or rebels are engaging rebels and they see you as a threat in an 'active gunfight' which you had absolutely no idea was going on. Can they do that?
Example 3.5) You hear the gunfire very clearly, so you know there is a gunfight. You get out with your weapon, do they have the right to shoot you still?
Hopefully some of these being answered, will clear things up for me, and others on this community. Since the term active gunfight is thrown around as a police rule, and also a rebel assumption.
Thanks!