I'll address the main points of this report. I'll also add some comments that might retread the ground of my previous comment but for clarity of judgement this seems appropriate...
----
1) The rule issue as shown in the video evidence
It's not a point of contention that a rule was broken here. To be specific, rule (2.4). It would be exploiting a mechanic of the game where your restraints will drop if the person that restrains you is too far away. Occasionally there are bugs with this system so when your restraints drop you should be given the following message...
"You have been unrestrained as your restrainers left the area. Please Note: If there is a situation still ongoing, please remain where you are and raise your hands (Shift+J)"
This message seemingly didn't fire and this will be looked into on a development level, but as a result of that, more leeway can reasonably be given for not acting as expected. The important question therefore is whether there was intent to exploit the issue in this case. Given TikTak's reaction and admission that in the heat of the moment it could reasonably appear that Jolly was lockpicked from restraints, it's reasonable for Jolly to react to what was being said in character and run away. As a result of this, I am going to make the judgement call that this was a simple misunderstanding and not take action for the initial action of exploiting. Jolly is clearly aware of this mechanic now and this will not be a mistake that he makes again.
---
2) Hearsay from the discussion on the forum and some wider context
The second point to question then is why Jolly didn't return to rectify the mistake. This isn't shown in video evidence so my judgement on this matter should be fairly predictable, however discussion on the forums has made the situation context slightly clearer. As a result of this I will make some observations on the situation for future reference of both parties.
To the best of my understanding, the hostage taking party including TikTak made no contact with Jolly to make him aware that the rule was broken. It was actually another police officer who advised Jolly that it appeared from his view that he may have glitched from restraints. Realising this, Jolly returned to the situation to see if the people in question would indicate to him out of character what happened but he was instead met (reportedly) by a continuation of the RP in the form of requests to put his hands up. It isn't something I can expect Jolly to have assumed that they meant he
had to put his hands up because they believed he'd broken a rule as this was not communicated out of character to him. His choice to instead continue with the RP fresh seems reasonable.
There isn't a requirement to break RP immersion to type out of character but if you don't do this, "RP everything" would be the default and you deal with any disagreements at the end of the situation. TikTak instead chose not to discuss this with Jolly and place a report on the forums. While this is allowed, I can't avoid the fact that in a non-clearcut situation like this I can't assume malice on Jolly's behalf.
----
3) Final decision and a suggestion for future situations
My decision is fairly simple (in spite of how long-winded this post is...). Jolly could be reasonably assumed to have made a simple mistake in this circumstances and if TikTak had chosen to assume good intentions of Jolly rather than assume malice based on a blanket opinion on him as a member of a faction, he would likely have found Jolly to be perfectly willing to act to mitigate the mistake and all sides could have enjoyed a quality RP situation.
@TikTak you're somewhat misunderstanding me in my view it seems, based on your response to my earlier comments. I don't expect you to spend long periods of time in liaison rooms having disputes with members unless you wish to. I do however believe that this is indeed an adult community and by treating members as well intentioned adults, you will find many to be very happy to fix their mistakes in a way that could create more quality RP. Jolly made a simple mistake and would have acted to fix his mistake if you had not assumed the worst of him. I would take this as a lesson in future as it appears to me and others that you are very fast to report members of the police vexatiously due to your own biases and unwillingness to talk to them. We will not humour this by actioning all reports of rulebreaks when you make no attempt to account for the reasonable human mistakes of other players.
Report declined.