What's new
Roleplay UK

Join the UK's biggest roleplay community on FiveM and experience endless new roleplay opportunities!

Report a Player - PC Ant Arni - Poor/Low Quality RP (Action Taken)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cool

TankMeister
Location
Advanced rebel
Your In-game name

C O O L

Name of the player(s) you are reporting

PC Ant Arni

Date of the incident

23/04/18

Time of the incident (GMT)

1530

What best describes this incident ?

Poor/Low Quality RP

Which server did the incident take place on

Server 1

Please (in detail) describe the incident

We wanted to take police hostage. Yoke spot a AR coming towards us. We get ready with spikes and spike them. I tell them to surrender otherwise lethal force will be used. All that was said back was "Why would you wanna shoot us". I give Ant Arni and his fellow officer plenty of time, but hes more interested in taking cover behind my car and running around it rather than talking to me. I give him a final warning and he attempts to just sprays me. He could have easily stopped running around for cover and stopped to talk to me or holstered his gun and we could have had a relaxed chat instead of me being scared for my life. Or simply just complied with my demands. The officer with Arni at the time even wanted to surrender. He clearly stated he was going to surrender as soon as he was done repairing.

The situation overall just displays how he clearly doesnt want to roleplay and he just getting ready for a gunfight constantly getting cover instead of talking and actually roleplay. After the situation I uploaded the video and went to support to consult if it would be seen as low quality roleplay or not. I was informed by Level 4 staff "Matt" that it was not good and it would be seen as low quality roleplay.

This situation is more or less exactly the same as this where the person was banned for low quality roleplay for a reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVcL5TIcXYE

I then contacted Arni and talked to him about the situation. He seemed more interested in complaining about OG calling police to laision than the situation. I inform him he needs to counter initiate and he just tells me to report him. Video of resolving:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuyK09iCatU&feature=youtu.be

Link to any evidence (Youtube/Screenshot)


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



This report is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

Yes

You tried to resolve the situation with the player(s) before reporting

Yes

This is not a revenge report (Abuse will lead to forum/community bans)

Yes

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's start off with the facts as well as timestamps in your video of what happened and what was said in this situation:

  1. We get spiked as we're being chased by rebels [2:11]
  2. We begin to repair our vehicle as Cool decamps out of his vehicle pulling his weapon out and the following dialogue occurs [2:20]:
  3. COOL: Officers how are you, I'm apart of OG and I want to rob some cops so I would like you to please place your hands on your head otherwise lethal force will be used against you [2:22]
  4. Ant: Why would we place our hands on our heads - lethal force, why the fuck would you shoot us? [2:29]
  5. COOL: If you don't surrender that's what we're going to have to do [2:35]
  6. Ant: I mean, can we not talk about this (cut off as you start speaking at this point) [2:40]
  7. COOL: Last warning stop running or I'm going to have to fucking shoot you [2:41]
  8. Ant Arni, using his far more superior weapons knowledge & combat ability, manages to break Cool's leg but sadly Cool manages to kill Ant with the much superior weapon
So, now let's analyse this situation including both the facts (stated above) as well as your opinion on the situation:

  1. As cops we're already being chased by rebels and then we get spiked just after an 'island tsunami' struck, meaning that the spike strips weren't there as an accident or being forgotten by a clumsy officer, but they were placed (and placed by rebels considering no cops had got out of their vehicles here since the tsunami)
  2. We're being chased by rebels, we're spiked by rebels, and then an armed rebel jumps out of his vehicle right next to us - it's pretty obvious what their intent is especially considering another armed quilin drove past the us on the way here too - I'm not going to leave ourselves unguarded while my colleague is repairing the vehicle so I pull my weapon out and start jogging around to keep myself on alert as well as making sure any other enemies in the area would struggle just that little bit more to tap me in the head if anything happens
  3. 'please place your hands on your head' - this is the order he gives us . Being two trained members of Armed Response along with another armed response vehicle just behind us (which they knew about way in advance considering it was it drove past them and turned around before us) we weren't just going to surrender to such a small number of threats, only 1 being directly visible to us right now. 'otherwise lethal force will be used against you- this is his threat. He tells us he is going to murder us if we don't comply with his order, which for reasons already given we are not planning on doing, so I decide to attempt to negotiate with Cool to:

    Stop this operation for them so that there doesn't have to be a fight
  4. Stall so that if it does turn into a fight more officers are in the area so as to eliminate the threat with the least amount of damage to the police force (increase our chances of survival)

[*]This is where I respond to your request and your threat - I ask you why you would shoot us, after all there's 4 of us close together, why would we comply? Do they just want a fight (it's a rhetorical question - I don't want this thread to turn into back & forth this is just something that is going through my mind at the time and not something I actually want an answer for)? Are they seriously expecting us to put our hands up from that? This is me trying to stop you from killing us by roleplaying - it's not anything magical but you claim that this is the only thing that I said which is completely false (see quote below) considering in this one sentence alone I say more, and I say more later...
All that was said back was "Why would you wanna shoot us"


[*]This isn't you justifying your actions - you are again just making your request and making a threat again - nothing indepth or creative here, just... a 'meh' response that doesn't add anything at all to the situation that I can work with to roleplay. If anything, I believe that you are more at risk of being called out for poor roleplay than I am considering the fact that at least I'm trying to do something creative with the little opportunity you're allowing me, whereas you're just repeating the same unenthusiastic, uninspiring 'roleplay'. This whole report is based on the fact that I didn't roleplay enough to shoot you, or specifically that I didn't counter initiate (which is never a requirement... you've just said you're going to kill me I'm in full right to defend myself - you're being silly if you thought this was ever a rule for situations like this, especially when you almost immediately say 'last chance', meaning you're literally not letting them roleplay with you...).

[*]Here I say 'can we not talk about this' - I literally ask you to roleplay this situation with me rather than turning it into a fight which it inevitably leads to (where I fire the first shot, but that's on the next point). Your claim that this is 'poor RP' is, I believe, completely invalid - here I'm trying to turn this into a conversation where where something interesting can come out of without, as I've already explained, us complying.

[*]To me asking whether or not we can talk about this situation, you respond with 'last warning stop running or I'm going to have to fucking shoot you' - you state that this is your final warning; by this you mean that you aren't going to say anything else to make me put my hands up, and if I do anything but put my hands on my head (including trying to talk to you) - you confirm this by saying and once again threatening my life 'I'm going to have to fucking shoot you'. Now, you might mention that in this case your request was for me to stop running rather than to put my hands on my head but I'll argue otherwise considering you said 'last warning', implying that this warning carries on from your previous warning(s) and in addition to putting my  hands on my head you now also want me to stop running.

[*]The situation started tense, and the dialogue started off with an instantaneous request and threat to life. Throughout the dialogue I try to turn the conversation into something we can maybe have some fun with or at least drag out the conversation so it's not a fight straight away but I don't get the chance, as the dialogue ends with a 'final warning' leaving me little opportunity to do anything - you might as well be saying 'if you say anything else you're going to die'. I see only two choices here, considering talking is not one of them, and that is:


  1. Put my hands on my head
  2. Defend myself appropriately considering the situation, that being by shooting the person who has constantly threatened me and my colleague

In conclusion to my analysis of the situation, I believe that I tried to RP the situation to the best of my abilities considering the circumstances and I strongly believe that if he thinks that I'm in the wrong for not roleplaying it anymore, he should only blame himself considering the corner he''s backed me into leaving me no more opportunity to talk to him.

Now to analyse some of what was said in the report itself:

He could have easily stopped running around for cover and stopped to talk to me or holstered his gun and we could have had a relaxed chat instead of me being scared for my life.
I could have easily stopped running around for cover, just like you could have easily not tried to take us hostage? I see this point as completely irrelevant. He also says 'we could have had a relaxed chat instead of me being scared for my life' - what kind of 'relaxed' chat are you hoping for in this situation? Need I remind you that multiple rebels were chasing us, you immobilised our vehicle, jumped out with a highly illegal highly dangerous automatic assault rifle and then threatened our lives?

The officer with Arni at the time even wanted to surrender. He clearly stated he was going to surrender as soon as he was done repairing.
What an officer says and what an officer does doesn't always need to be the same... I see no rule that says that as a police officer we must never lie and I can tell you that we had no intention to surrender.

And quite possibly one of the most serious parts of this report and hopefully the one that as a community we can get the most out of:

The situation overall just displays how he clearly doesnt want to roleplay and he just getting ready for a gunfight constantly getting cover instead of talking and actually roleplay.
No no no... I'm glad we have taken the liberty to make assumptions now because I am now going to make some assumptions on you:

Are you here to roleplay or ruleplay? It seems that every situation we are in, hell even if the situation doesn't involve you whatsoever, if you have something to complain about, you'll complain about it. I've spent more time in liason with you now then I have with my friends in your gang, which says a lot. You have such a negative view of other people on the server, especially the police (and especially members of AR), that it results in you looking for the smallest of flaws that you can get people in trouble for when at the end of the day, we're all human. There's been countless situations where you guys could have been reported by people in the police, things which you would have definitely ended up reporting for if it was the other way around, but we just get on with it because at the end of the day, I don't think you guys are here to purposefully break rules you just occasionally do break rules, just like anyone else - sometimes quite severely, but you slip up, and we accept it (for the most part). I'm not saying that I slipped up in this situation, because I was dealt a bad set of cards and I did the best I could with them, I'm just saying... Next time you're going to report someone for 'poor rp' at least let them try and RP and try and RP yourself.

For example, just yesterday you ran two cops over and hit a stationary vehicle (video) while trying to escape from the police and we didn't so much as receive an apology. Did we end up reporting or even trying to bring you to teamspeak for this? No! If this was the other way around though, don't try and tell me you wouldn't have reported them because that video looks pretty bad/intentional to be honest. I don't bring this up as something to get you into trouble, I could have already done that if it were my intention and it really isn't, it's just there to serve my point that you don't need to turn every little rule 'break' into a big deal just to get people in trouble. I strongly believe that you guys have some sort of vendeta against not only the police force, but perhaps specific people in the police force or a group of people and this report is associated with that (a revenge report, if you will).

In conclusion to the entirety of my response, I really don't want to turn this into a back and forth thing so unless asked by an admin to respond I really won't be wasting my time doing so. 

Edit: After reviewing the evidence a bit more I notice that you have Ryan's stream open in your browser (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuyK09iCatU&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=Cool) - he was the one in the car with me that got spiked. I think it's important for the staff looking at this report to notice this considering Ryan was dead & logged off when we were resolving the situation (so there was nothing interesting happening on his stream while we were resolving), therefore he must have had the stream open while the situation was on-going or even before that while he's playing the game - seems a bit dodgy, what I'm obviously implying here is that cool may have been stream sniping but I guess he can defend himself to this allegation if he so chooses.

In addition, I noticed that one of the main reasons he is justifying calling me to liason in the second video is because I didn't 'counter initiate' - since when has this ever been a requirement? The rules don't state it and neither have my over 2 years of experience on the server. As long as the roleplay is to a high quality & you've done everything you can for the situation not to turn into a fight I see no issue with shooting someone without 'counter initiating' - I feel as if you are only trying to make this seem as a rule so that the 'initiator' isn't caught off-guard after threatening the life of someone he is demanding something off of.

Finally, the situation that you say is 'pretty much' the same as this one is in fact nothing like this one. The fact that you say this implies to me that you will say anything to try and get me into trouble no matter how much of a short string you're holding onto. The man in the situation you are referring to doesn't say a word after you threaten his life, which is completely different to my situation - if you honestly believe these situations are similar, well... embarrassing really.

At the end of the day, you threatened my life, I tried to roleplay with you, you denied my roleplay and reiterated the fact that if I were to do anything but complete your demand I would die (including trying to speak with you). You don't let me roleplay, and then you report me for not roleplaying. Hello? I've never even had so much as a warning point for 'bad rp'.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can say that you wanted to roleplay, but you still choose to run around my car like it was xmas. That alone displays to me you werent going to surrender no matter what. You can say I ruleplay all you want I dont really mind. Like I said whats the point of having rules if you dont follow up on people breaking them. I asked lv 4 staff if it was okay or not. I was informed it was bad and therefore I wanted to raise the issue. I went to laison and tried to resolve as documented above and you just told me to report you. If you have an issue with different situations feel free to contact me and I am sure we will be able to resolve it, but lets focus on the actual situation. 

Ive said whats need to said from my side and Ill leave it for staff. 

 
Edit: After reviewing the evidence a bit more I notice that you have Ryan's stream open in your browser (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuyK09iCatU&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=Cool) - he was the one in the car with me that got spiked. I think it's important for the staff looking at this report to notice this considering Ryan was dead & logged off when we were resolving the situation (so there was nothing interesting happening on his stream while we were resolving), therefore he must have had the stream open while the situation was on-going or even before that while he's playing the game - seems a bit dodgy, what I'm obviously implying here is that cool may have been stream sniping but I guess he can defend himself to this allegation if he so chooses.
Just been informed of this and had to address this i think. The video of us talking is after I have already uploaded the video and had already been in support(Video of resolving). It is a good 30 minutes after the situation at least. I had the stream open because there was people chatting about somebody calling a OG member a squeaker or some shit. As the stream has been deleted now it doesnt matter anyway, however I am curious to know why the video/stream was deleted. Here is the link to the video that was removed: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/253587212

You can clearly hear that Yoke is giving us all the information we need and he is right above you during the entire situation. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This report is about @Ant Arni breaking rule -
(7.1.3) Killing someone must be carried out with high quality roleplay, “put your hands up or I will shoot” etc is considered low quality RP and may lead to a ban for RDM/Fail RP. Executing another player must also be carried out with high quality roleplay, the only exception to this rule is if both you and the victim are engaged in a gunfight together.

Let's review the RP that was given by both sides with this situation. 

  1. COOL: Officers how are you, I'm apart of OG and I want to rob some cops so I would like you to please place your hands on your head otherwise lethal force will be used against you 
  2. Ant: Why would we place our hands on our heads - lethal force, why the fuck would you shoot us? 
  3. COOL: If you don't surrender that's what we're going to have to do 
  4. Ant: I mean, can we not talk about this
  5. COOL: Last warning stop running or I'm going to have to fucking shoot you.
Ant Arni does say more but I cant make it out as you in-game sound is very low and I cant hear it above your own talking. Never the less what could have been said in those short bits where I cant hear would not have raised what Ant Arni level of RP to High-quality standards.  
I will agree that the standard of RP given by Ant Arni was low but I do not believe this was completely his fault as the situation started off at a very low level and with the way the scenario was going I don't think it would have got much better.

@Ant Arni This is a very poor showing from yourself and a lot better is expected, especially as you have only been unbanned a week ago.  Looking at your record you have a few warnings and bans for a variety of different things. None of those things are for Poor RP or for RDM in fact not of them are for any type of combat situation. This is very fortunate for you as if I had seen any warnings of that sort on your record you would have been banned.  If I'm honest with the interesting history you have I don't think you would have been coming back any time soon.
This is a Final Warning any mistakes that lead to you being warned by a staff member will result in a ban. I hope this is perfectly clear to you.

@Cool

I am very glad that you brought up another situation where you witnessed someone killing you with no hostile intent or initiation shown leading to him being banned for RDM.  Though, that was a case of RDM and not fail RP as you have shown in your own video. 

Let me explain myself a little, In rule 7.1.3 it says that Killing someone must be carried out with High Quality Roleplay.  You used the line "Officers how are you, I'm apart of OG and I want to rob some cops so I would like you to please place your hands on your head otherwise lethal force will be used against you". The part of that sentence I'm looking at is the end part which I have changed the texted to green.  "Place your hand on your head or lethal force will be used." This sounds very much like the next part of rule 7.1.3 "put your hands up or I will shoot you". The reason we don't like sentences like that is that they kill any further chances to get any sort of RP going. 
The rest of the RP that you say is of the same standard. Overall the RP that was shown by you with of the same standard if not lower than that of Ant Arni.  


Now how can I deal with this?  When I look at your battle metrics I see that you have 2 warnings in less than 6 months for Fail RP and RDM. The RDM warning even says that you did RDM the person involved.  I would normally be giving a warning to you for this offense, but with a history like yours where you are not showing that you are learning from your warnings, you have received from Staff member. I can not give you a third warning for this offense and as such you force my hand to award you with a ban for Fail RP. 

C O O L (Name, an hour ago)
76561198024019524 (Steam ID, an hour ago)
f4052aa281b0dc98b90e24effc585acd (BattlEye GUID, an hour ago)

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top