What's new
By:
Filters
Roleplay UK

Join the UK's biggest roleplay community on FiveM and experience endless new roleplay opportunities!

Report a Player - FabioHoeg and Bill Whyte - RDM (Report Rejected)

Status
Not open for further replies.
SpeedyEyeBall

SpeedyEyeBall

Member
Location
UK
Your In-game name

Hugh Mungus

Name of the player(s) you are reporting

FabioHoeg and Bill Whyte

Date of the incident

02/05/2017

Time of the incident (GMT)

1647

What best describes this incident ?

RDM

Which server did the incident take place on

Server 2

Please (in detail) describe the incident

I was in a truck with my gang, waiting for another member when another car showed up and a man (FabioHoeg) exited the vehicle and pulled a gun. He then proceeded to shoot at us. He had a friend (Bill Whyte) who was hiding away who also shot at us. We then invited them to public 4 on teamspeak which they came on but then they left before we could resolve it.

Link to any evidence (Youtube/Screenshot)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=555_lCg3Vn4&feature=youtu.be
This report is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

Yes

You tried to resolve the situation with the player(s) before reporting

Yes

This is not a revenge report (Abuse will lead to forum/community bans)

Yes

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't quite get it.. We were in TS to solve this, you told us you would msg us once the video was up so we could see what you guys heard. You never msg'ed us and now you're jumping straight to reporting us instead of attempting to finish resolving the situation.

Me and Bill are ready for a talk with a staff member present. 

Also I didn't just "start shooting" straight away... I didn't shoot back before I was receiving shots.

I believe you're leaving out key points.. The fact that you never proceeded to msg us when the video was up as we agreed that you would do. Also I told you in TS that I didn't just start firing away which you still decided to leave in the details which if you look in my recording, I didn't fire a bullet.

Also we're still in TS, we have been on TS since the incident.

Also is it possible we can get another POV since it seems odd that you wouldn't be able to hear the initiation considering i'm right next to you guys.

http://plays.tv/video/58977311bf06640588/i-didnt-shoot-straight-away-

http://plays.tv/video/58977d7c9c1b125821/ts-conversation

http://prnt.sc/e4w8g9 look at bottom right corner for date and time.

For staff member reviewing this please take this into consideration - The game volume is incredibly low, if you look bottom left corner you can see that he does in fact not have ear plugs in. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont understand why in the video at 30s the audio is quiet, and then it raises volume 10 seconds later. Also you could clearly hear the initiation as he was right next to you. And also at the start your vehicle is very quiet, which I don't understand because you didn't have earplugs in. Also when you called us down to TeamSpeak we agreed that when the evidence was uploaded you would message me or FabioHoeg to call us back down to your room. We did not get any message in response. 

 
To add to Fabio's point of VOIP range, this a model of what the area was like (Roughly). http://prntscr.com/e5dbvp

Im sure that that is definitely within the VOIP range because the distance is half or quater of a school classroom, and It's not like Fabio was whispering.

 
Is there a reason the resolving with Bill White is taking so long? @SpeedyEyeBall

 
At this moment in time, I don't feel like 3 reports for the same reason/time is nessesarry. It is a pain to reply on all of them everytime I have a point. I feel like I have a good case to back me, therefore I shall not be resolving this.

Points I have:

 
Okay, so given that there are 3 reports up for the exact same thing, and given all provide the same evidence I am going to reject 2 out of 3 of these reports based off the fact that there is no need to have 3 up. 

I will be rejecting the two that have FabioHoeg included because the situation with him has been resolved. 

Alright, I was hoping that you would be able to resolve the situation with the reportee so we can close all three of these reports at the same time but I guess you don't want to do that so what I will do instead is close the two reports that have Fabio included because the situation with him has been sorted out and then work on the one that is simply reporting Bill White. 

If the outcome of the situation is a ban, or I feel compensation is warranted then based on the 1 report of Bill White which we will keep up, comp can be given (Again, ONLY if the outcome is a ban or compensation is warranted)

Please refer to the report of just Bill White for the continuation of this report. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top