Khandamir
Currently residing in Los Santos
- Location
- Twente
Is this ruleplay? A skilled pilot can hover so close above someone elses landed helicopter they have no real way to take off. The rules mean that IF you try and hit the other, you get done in for VDM. This creates a situation in which the rules provide unfair protection for the side hovering over the other helicopter. You can't win if you're under it. You either surrender and lose the heli/gear or run and lose the helicopter. In a serious RP environment, no situation should be decided before it begins, but with the rules not allowing for a exception to the VDM rule, this seems the case to me.
Maybe the rules should be amended saying that if you purposely hover over grounded helicopter, the party below should be allowed to try and escape. I think it should be considered a risk both parties knew they were taking in that situation and thus no claims of VDM should be able to be made after such a thing happens.
By letting things stay as they are, you are basically letting people bait someone into VDM and then punish the side that really had no other choice. Also, the hovering creates unwanted situations on the ground as well, as even if you decide to try and talk your way out of the stalemate, there is still a massive helicopter hovering 10 meters above you, making it near impossible to have proper roleplay.
All things considered I would like some thoughts on this subject and I wonder where other people stand on it. For me right now I see two solutions 1) Clause added to VDM rule saying that both parties take the risk and a clash is not against VDM rule in such situations where one helicopter purposely hovers close over another or 2) Clause added to VDM rule saying that purposely hovering over other helicopters trying to prevent their take-off is an unacceptable risk for VDM to occur and is thus not allowed.
Maybe the rules should be amended saying that if you purposely hover over grounded helicopter, the party below should be allowed to try and escape. I think it should be considered a risk both parties knew they were taking in that situation and thus no claims of VDM should be able to be made after such a thing happens.
By letting things stay as they are, you are basically letting people bait someone into VDM and then punish the side that really had no other choice. Also, the hovering creates unwanted situations on the ground as well, as even if you decide to try and talk your way out of the stalemate, there is still a massive helicopter hovering 10 meters above you, making it near impossible to have proper roleplay.
All things considered I would like some thoughts on this subject and I wonder where other people stand on it. For me right now I see two solutions 1) Clause added to VDM rule saying that both parties take the risk and a clash is not against VDM rule in such situations where one helicopter purposely hovers close over another or 2) Clause added to VDM rule saying that purposely hovering over other helicopters trying to prevent their take-off is an unacceptable risk for VDM to occur and is thus not allowed.