What's new
Roleplay UK

Join the UK's biggest roleplay community on FiveM and experience endless new roleplay opportunities!

4K or 144Hz? For gaming in general

4K or 144Hz?


  • Total voters
    16

Mr Bilbo

Well-known member
Location
Currently unknown
As the title says for gaming in general because we all know in Arma you ain't going anywhere near 100 fps in Arma XD

Can a staff member please move this to Tech discussion, please? I'm a twat and can't read XD

 
You go 4k if you want to look at a pretty game.

You go 144 hertz if you want to play more competitivly. Once you hit for example Global in CSGO something like a 144hertz becomes something of almost of a necessity. What a 144 hertz allows you to do is see the enemy on your screen quicker than what your normal monitor will (you've most likely got a 60 hertz monitor). This is becuase the refresh rate is higher which allows for this to occur. If you consider this option make sure that you actually have a good PC as you need conisistant high frames in order for the 144 hertz to take effect. If not, then you'll get stuttering.

On a note of the 144 hertz, i'd personally only get it if you're really good at a game for example like CS where you need quick reactions but other than that it's in my oponion pointless. 

If you want some direction of what monitor to ideally get just message me and I can recommend a few.

 
@Mr Bilbo

Your poll is a bit incomplete. Are you thinking of 1080@144hz? 1440@144hz? 4k@30hz? 4k@60hz? 4k@MoreHz?

What GPU do you have also? For example with a 1060 or 1070 you're unlikely to be gaming at 4k@60hz or more, even 30hz could be a struggle. What physical size of screen as well? If you're going for a Large size, then higher res is better, or you end up with a 'blockier' image as your physical pixels will be larger on a 32" 1080 screen than a 24" screen.

You could use this as a rough reference, but dont consider it complete:

  • 1080@60Hz/144hz - 22-26" screens
  • 1440p@60/144hz - 27-30" Screens
  • 4K@60/60/100+ - 30"+
Most 4K monitors (not TVs) are INCREDIBLY expensive, and thats before you get to the GPU hardware to power them. Best middle of the road option is either 1080@144 or 1440p@60 I plan to make my next monitor 1440p@60, 144hz if I have the extra money, but these are quite expensive also - several hundred quid for a decent 1440@144hz.

This also doesnt take into account technolgoies like Free/G-Sync or Ultra-Wide monitors.

 
@GHOSTK1LL3R Cheers, I ain't no comp player, to be honest, so I ain't needing all of the FPS.

@Zeito Thanks, if I had the cash I would be going for 4k 144Hz with all the gear needed for it. I've currently got a GTX 970 and so does my friend, hes running a 4k@60Hz off of it and its running fine-ish for Arma and a couple of other games like World of Tanks etc. I'm just trying to find out whats better at the moment to put money into.

 
With a 970 you're probably not going to experience the full deal with a 4k 144hz so I wouldn't myself spend a few hundred euro's pounds on a monitor which will most likely not give you it's full experience. Recommending either choosing between the higher resolution or the 144 Hz. 1080 144Hz or 1440 60Hz to which it comes down to what you want most. Either a monitor with quicker response time or a monitor with sharper, more clearer images. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
With a 970 I'd go for a 144hz, feels alot smoother in general for everything, plus it might be pretty with a 4k setup but you won't run arma ideally

at all

 
Back
Top