Detailed Rule Suggestion:
I propose a change to the current g5.1 rule as currently there are names that have been affected by this such as "Pat Mcgroin" or those of known fictional characters such as Harry Potter.
The current rule is left open-ended but the big addition in the change here is...
https://www.pcgamer.com/tencent-buys-a-piece-of-arma-developer-bohemia-interactive/?utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Facebook.com intresting tencent bought some of bohemia interactive.
Thank you for your report, Unfortunately, it has been declined
The staff member will advise shortly why on this occasion they have declined to take action against the reported player.
Please do not let this put you off making further reports in the future, We rely on our player base to help...
Upon reviewing this, I have decided to deny the report as in both videos the reporters mic does not pick up and therefore I believe this is Insufficient in this case.
Although your request didn't meet our compensation request criteria, it might be an idea to join our Steam Group and Discord to get more involved with the community!
Steam Group: RPUK Steam Group
Discord: RPUK Discord
Although your request didn't meet our compensation request criteria, it might be an idea to join our Steam Group and Discord to get more involved with the community!
Steam Group: RPUK Steam Group
Discord: RPUK Discord
Thank you for your report, Unfortunately, it has been declined
The staff member will advise shortly why on this occasion they have declined to take action against the reported player.
Please do not let this put you off making further reports in the future, We rely on our player base to help...
All good had taken it to the game was unsure of how to speak with police command in specific. I have since went there and was advised to go to "government radio" if I wanted to speak with police command. Again was unsure if that's entirely right though as city Hall has something which link you...
The post is slightly old now and the rule was 7.1.3 but is now listed as A6.1.3 but this may help to clarify in the present while your suggestion is in.
Your report has been dealt with, but perhaps not in the way you originally envisaged.
Whether this is beneficial or disadvantageous to you will depend entirely on the situation, and staff will have taken the most-appropriate action in the circumstances.
It has been over 24 hours now and I will be pressing on with this report. Without a full recording of the situation, It is impossible for me to make a ruling on what roleplay did or did not occur after the event in question. As for alleged rule break, I do not see this as VDM. This appears to me...
Thank you for your report, Unfortunately, it has been declined
The staff member will advise shortly why on this occasion they have declined to take action against the reported player.
Please do not let this put you off making further reports in the future, We rely on our player base to help...
Right, about 1:41 you can hear incoming fire, which more or less indicates you have now entered combat. Which is highly expected of a redzone. When you have been engaged upon in a redzone that fight does not end at the border of said zone.
Apologies if this sounded confusing, it was more of a rant that, that the video wasn't long enough to show that I couldn't even hear or see the dispute that usually comes after the point that someone feels there has been a rule break. The one that has been indicated through your chats together...