This previously was because there was a soft cap of how often you could upvote posts by a certain person. There was also an issue with whether or not you had already liked it was displayed correct. This should no longer the case with newest reputation system. Post again if this recurs.
Given that you haven't been here for a long time and got banned for using an exploit 2 months after being unbanned, and then proceeded to immediately name other communities on this appeal in spite of the forum rules infer about advertising, I think it might be a good idea for you to try a new...
My initial question really is why should I bother with this appeal? You get denied for lack of effort, you comment on someone else's appeal (breaking forum rules) and then you disappear for a month therefore allowing your new appeal to time out. This is all after you have already been...
I suppose the pressing question is, if you repeatedly broke the same rule (dare I say the underpinning rule of the whole community), how can we seriously trust you this time? You seem serious about roleplaying properly this time but I can't help but have a degree of uncertainty in my mind given...
We won't keep these appeals open indefinitely. When you are looking to get unbanned and are able to reply promptly you should appeal again.
I expect you to answer Ram's question when that time comes.
Denied.
20:00 Update:
NHS
Ambulance Skin (@Gurlanin)
Ambulance "attachments" corrected (@CC Joseph Tadworth)
POLICE
Fixed the van's having the wrong "attachments" (@CC Joseph Tadworth)
BACKEND
Re-wrote all of the networking scripts and (BattleEye) filters ( @Ciaran)
Important phrase there.
"Ram other MRAPS in order to disable them" is the difference. The situation you are referencing @Simen lead to a number of deaths. It is very a much a context judgement that lead to a ban being issued in that case.
(12.3) Creating threads with the intention to cause issues or drama will not be tolerated and may lead to warning points or being issued a ban.
(12.5) Using status updates to talk about or discuss bans will first lead to a warning point then if that continues a second warning point with a 7...
This report bothers me somewhat. You don't appear to be able contain yourself from going on and on about how terrible the "Morrisons gang" are. This is a report against a singular player and it's not relevant what your opinion of his gang is. He stands alone and made his own choices here so...
An interesting case. You sound like a reasonably focused roleplayer but yet you broke some serious rules. As a self-proclaimed long time player, would you not hold yourself to a higher standard than to break two of our most serious in game rules? You got a warning from a staff member instead of...
Right then...
16/02/2017 22:44
(Direct)
YLL Jack
FUCK THE ADMIN HE HAS CANCER
16/02/2017 22:44
(Direct)
YLL Jack
FUCK YOU NIGGER
16/02/2017 22:44
(Direct)
YLL Jack
JEW
16/02/2017 22:44
(Direct)
YLL Jack
HOLOCAUST
16/02/2017 22:44
(Direct)
YLL Jack
NIGGER...
Right where the hell do I start with this shitshow?
1) I fail to see how anyones ideas about who has a vendetta against who really contribute anything. I'm mildly disappointed to see that your idea of resolving a situation on a report is to make it an argument of who doesn't like anyone else...