Search results

@Jake - Do you have any video recordings from your point of view?

Personally I'd like to see the server at a state where any guns are very rare, and are only shown in public by the brash and stupid or when something serious is going down that warrants a person to bring out their heavy hitter. To reflect this, bullets of all calibres should deal some serious...

For ALUK, I think 2015 holds some of my favourite memories, such as the original UNMC and Maratek spawning an APC/tank to attack the checkpoint! It was also a time when people cared a lot more about their characters, and their actions on the server. The most common form of gunfight to see was...

@dopefish - Do you have any evidence to support your claims?

Personally I don't think any of the illegal areas should be marked. It would encourage more interaction between players as they try to find out where they are, and also mean that the police could try to find them to shut them down.

I agree that part of it is unbelievable. Sadly the NHS have to take the area around them and what the player themselves say for the RP, and sometimes there are those who simply don't want to "go through the hassle" of medical RP, despite how much we might encourage them that they were hit by a...

I'd be hesitant on this. I certainly wouldn't want this to be the end of the RP scenario. My worry is that people would just get downed then killed all the time. Say you manage to put down a group of cops. IRL, if you did that, the ENTIRE police force is going to be looking for you, gathering...

The key in any situation is high quality roleplay. If there is no quality roleplay then neither side has any reason to shoot, and if someone decides to then that's the rule they are breaking. "Put your hands up or I'll shoot" is not quality roleplay, let alone high quality.

I don't have the full context of that situation, so I can't comment on it. Please have a think about the questions I posed above, and look at the entire situation. It wasn't as simple as "guy pulls out pistol, other guy pulls out pistol and shoots". I've also been assuming that you're...

I disagree. What have they done, in this situation, do you believe, that would warrant a ban?

Would he? Given the context, I wouldn't ban.

The whole "initiating" thing that crops up again from time to time is, to me, a bit weird: it gives the illusion of some magic phrase that will turn a situation into a gunfight, which is, ironically, against the rules (see 2.2). A roleplay situation should evolve organically. No two situations...

There is not, and never has been, a rule about "counter initiation". In fact, the only rules that mention "initiation" are in the context of "initiating roleplay".

Nothing major from me, just a couple of minor non-priority bugs. Sitting down on the admin office chair causes the character to .. umm ... float ... In the Director's office, there is no option to sit on the chair, and the circle from one of the elevators clips through the wall meaning that...

I agree. This is meant to be a legal and non-confrontational role designed to be a bit different. It would be nice to be able to trust people to use it properly though, rather than enforce any rules or the like. Potentially have an application process, and the licence can only be given out by...

This sounds like a really nice idea!

I think they perform different functions, so should be separate, but at the same time it is a game and roadside repair ability would make sense for HATO to have/give more to do involving interacting with other players.

The highways of Los Santos are a busy place. People break down, have accidents, or encounter mountain lions, and it disrupts the entire network! Rather than tie up police resources dealing with these issues, I think it would be nice to give law abiding citizens the chance to perform a public...